Reader Response for "The Double Edge of Globalization" (Final Draft)

  In “The Double Edge of Globalization”, Chanda (2007) points out that expanded international trade, which contributes to urbanization and economic growth, leads to environmental destruction. I do not totally agree with the idea. In my opinion, instead of expanded international trade, the lack of global awareness is the root cause of environmental degradation.

  I cannot rebut that intensified international trade encourages consumption but it causes the loss of forest cover worldwide. For instance, according to Chanda, the environmental organization Greenpeace estimates that more than 2.5 million acres of tropical forest have been cleared by China in recent years to increase the demand for soybeans for other countries. In my point of view, many multinational companies choose to destroy the environment rather than using any other ways, which are more environmental friendly, for their own economic benefits. They fail to realise long-term conservation of environment is much more important than short-term benefits.

  As we all know, nowadays, ecological system is seriously affected by trade. Many nations wreak havoc on the habitats of flora and fauna to product traded goods. What if they are clearly aware of the potential of environmental devastation to shrink the global economy? I think they will not act without prudent consideration.

  I believe that environmental degradation brought by expanded international trade can be ameliorated by global awareness. Therefore, I think that international consensus on pollution reduction should be built to curb the problems.

Word Count: 236 words